mediocregopher/mediocre-blog
1
0
Fork 0
Code Pull Requests Releases Activity

couple wording changes in namecoin post

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Brian Picciano 2013-11-20 20:50:20 -05:00
parent 1ba8c94823
commit 5b0c6a3739
1 changed files with 9 additions and 11 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

20
_posts/2013-10-25-namecoind-ssl.md
View File

@ -3,10 +3,10 @@ layout: post
title: Namecoin, A Replacement For SSL
---
At [cryptic.io][cryptic] we are attempting to create a client-side, in-browser
encryption system where a user can upload their already encrypted content to our
storage system and be 100% confident that their data can never be decrypted by
anyone but them.
At [cryptic.io][cryptic] we are creating a client-side, in-browser encryption
system where a user can upload their already encrypted content to our storage
system and be 100% confident that their data can never be decrypted by anyone
but them.
On of the main problems with this approach is that the client has to be sure
that the code that's being run in their browser is the correct code; that is,
@ -154,13 +154,11 @@ constantly increasing). When they find one they broadcast it out on the network.
Assuming the block is legitimate they receive some number of coins as
compensation.
When a block-chain based currency like bitcoin and namecoin, the element of the
system that keeps the currency going is there is compensation for doing the work
of getting items placed on the blockchain. If there were no compensation there
would be no reason to mine except out of goodwill, so far fewer people would do
it. Since the chain can be compromised if a malicious group has more computing
power than all legitimate miners combined, having few legitimate miners is a
serious problem.
That compensation is what keeps a blockchain based currency going. If there
were no compensation there would be no reason to mine except out of goodwill, so
far fewer people would do it. Since the chain can be compromised if a malicious
group has more computing power than all legitimate miners combined, having few
legitimate miners is a serious problem.
In the case of namecoins, there's even more reason to involve a currency. Since
you have to spend money to make changes to the chain there's a disincentive for