merge in other stuff real quick
This commit is contained in:
commit
98245f1639
75
README.md
75
README.md
@ -1,72 +1,9 @@
|
||||
# Lagom
|
||||
This is my here blog. It's not much at the moment (one post? booyah!), but maybe it'll grow.
|
||||
|
||||
> #### *Lagom* is a Swedish word with no direct English equivalent, meaning "just the right amount"
|
||||
Maybe not
|
||||
|
||||
Lagom, a [Jekyll][j] blog theme with just the right amount of style.
|
||||
* [Erlang, tcp sockets, and active true](erlang-tcp-socket-pull-pattern.md) (originally posted March 9, 2013)
|
||||
* [go+](goplus.md) (originally posted July 11, 2013)
|
||||
* [Generations](generations.md) (originally posted October 8, 2013)
|
||||
|
||||
Extracted lovingly from [http://mdswanson.com][mds] for your enjoyment!
|
||||
|
||||
* Responsive, based on [Skeleton][skeleton]
|
||||
* [Font Awesome][font-awesome] for icons
|
||||
* Open Sans from [Google web fonts][gfonts]
|
||||
* Built-in Atom RSS feed
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Shots
|
||||
![](http://i.imgur.com/Pmzk4j1.png)
|
||||
![](http://i.imgur.com/CT2Xvug.png)
|
||||
![](http://i.imgur.com/XisjqW1.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
## Installation
|
||||
|
||||
- Install Jekyll: `gem install jekyll`
|
||||
- [Fork this repository][fork]
|
||||
- Clone it: `git clone https://github.com/YOUR-USER/lagom`
|
||||
- Run the jekyll server: `jekyll serve`
|
||||
|
||||
You should have a server up and running locally at <http://localhost:4000>.
|
||||
|
||||
## Customization
|
||||
|
||||
Next you'll want to change a few things. Most of them can be changed directly in
|
||||
[_config.yml][config]. That's where you can add your social links, change the accent
|
||||
color, stuff like that.
|
||||
|
||||
There's a few other places that you'll want to change, too:
|
||||
|
||||
- [CNAME][cname]: If you're using this on GitHub Pages with a custom domain name,
|
||||
you'll want to change this to be the domain you're going to use. All that should
|
||||
be in here is a domain name on the first line and nothing else (like: `example.com`).
|
||||
- [favicon.png][favicon]: This is the icon in your browser's address bar. You should
|
||||
change it to whatever you'd like.
|
||||
- [logo.png][logo]: A square-ish image that appears in the upper-left corner
|
||||
|
||||
## Deployment
|
||||
|
||||
You should deploy with [GitHub Pages][pages] - it's just easier.
|
||||
|
||||
All you should have to do is rename your repository on GitHub to be
|
||||
`username.github.io`. Since everything is on the `gh-pages` branch, you
|
||||
should be able to see your new site at <http://username.github.io>.
|
||||
|
||||
## Licensing
|
||||
|
||||
[MIT](https://github.com/swanson/lagom/blob/master/LICENSE) with no
|
||||
added caveats, so feel free to use this on your site without linking back to
|
||||
me or using a disclaimer or anything silly like that.
|
||||
|
||||
## Contact
|
||||
I'd love to hear from you at [@_swanson][twitter]. Feel free to open issues if you
|
||||
run into trouble or have suggestions. Pull Requests always welcome.
|
||||
|
||||
[j]: http://jekyllrb.com/
|
||||
[mds]: http://mdswanson.com
|
||||
[skeleton]: http://www.getskeleton.com/
|
||||
[font-awesome]: http://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/
|
||||
[gfonts]: http://www.google.com/fonts/specimen/Open+Sans
|
||||
[fork]: https://github.com/swanson/lagom/fork
|
||||
[config]: https://github.com/swanson/lagom/blob/master/_config.yml
|
||||
[cname]: https://github.com/swanson/lagom/blob/master/CNAME
|
||||
[favicon]: https://github.com/swanson/lagom/blob/master/favicon.png
|
||||
[logo]: https://github.com/swanson/lagom/blob/master/logo.png
|
||||
[pages]: http://pages.github.com
|
||||
[twitter]: https://twitter.com/_swanson
|
||||
That's all folks!
|
||||
|
252
erlang-tcp-socket-pull-pattern.md
Normal file
252
erlang-tcp-socket-pull-pattern.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
|
||||
# Erlang, tcp sockets, and active true
|
||||
|
||||
If you don't know erlang then [you're missing out][0]. If you do know erlang,
|
||||
you've probably at some point done something with tcp sockets. Erlang's highly
|
||||
concurrent model of execution lends itself well to server programs where a high
|
||||
number of active connections is desired. Each thread can autonomously handle its
|
||||
single client, greatly simplifying the logic of the whole application while
|
||||
still retaining [great performance characteristics][1].
|
||||
|
||||
# Background
|
||||
|
||||
For an erlang thread which owns a single socket there are three different ways
|
||||
to receive data off of that socket. These all revolve around the `active`
|
||||
[setopts][2] flag. A socket can be set to one of:
|
||||
|
||||
* `{active,false}` - All data must be obtained through [recv/2][3] calls. This
|
||||
amounts to syncronous socket reading.
|
||||
|
||||
* `{active,true}` - All data on the socket gets sent to the controlling thread
|
||||
as a normal erlang message. It is the thread's
|
||||
responsibility to keep up with the buffered data in the
|
||||
message queue. This amounts to asyncronous socket reading.
|
||||
|
||||
* `{active,once}` - When set the socket is placed in `{active,true}` for a
|
||||
single packet. That is, once set the thread can expect a
|
||||
single message to be sent to when data comes in. To receive
|
||||
any more data off of the socket the socket must either be
|
||||
read from using [recv/2][3] or be put in `{active,once}` or
|
||||
`{active,true}`.
|
||||
|
||||
# Which to use?
|
||||
|
||||
Many (most?) tutorials advocate using `{active,once}` in your application
|
||||
\[0]\[1]\[2]. This has to do with usability and security. When in `{active,true}`
|
||||
it's possible for a client to flood the connection faster than the receiving
|
||||
process will process those messages, potentially eating up a lot of memory in
|
||||
the VM. However, if you want to be able to receive both tcp data messages as
|
||||
well as other messages from other erlang processes at the same time you can't
|
||||
use `{active,false}`. So `{active,once}` is generally preferred because it
|
||||
deals with both of these problems quite well.
|
||||
|
||||
# Why not to use `{active,once}`
|
||||
|
||||
Here's what your classic `{active,once}` enabled tcp socket implementation will
|
||||
probably look like:
|
||||
|
||||
```erlang
|
||||
-module(tcp_test).
|
||||
-compile(export_all).
|
||||
|
||||
-define(TCP_OPTS, [
|
||||
binary,
|
||||
{packet, raw},
|
||||
{nodelay,true},
|
||||
{active, false},
|
||||
{reuseaddr, true},
|
||||
{keepalive,true},
|
||||
{backlog,500}
|
||||
]).
|
||||
|
||||
%Start listening
|
||||
listen(Port) ->
|
||||
{ok, L} = gen_tcp:listen(Port, ?TCP_OPTS),
|
||||
?MODULE:accept(L).
|
||||
|
||||
%Accept a connection
|
||||
accept(L) ->
|
||||
{ok, Socket} = gen_tcp:accept(L),
|
||||
?MODULE:read_loop(Socket),
|
||||
io:fwrite("Done reading, connection was closed\n"),
|
||||
?MODULE:accept(L).
|
||||
|
||||
%Read everything it sends us
|
||||
read_loop(Socket) ->
|
||||
inet:setopts(Socket, [{active, once}]),
|
||||
receive
|
||||
{tcp, _, _} ->
|
||||
do_stuff_here,
|
||||
?MODULE:read_loop(Socket);
|
||||
{tcp_closed, _}-> donezo;
|
||||
{tcp_error, _, _} -> donezo
|
||||
end.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This code isn't actually usable for a production system; it doesn't even spawn a
|
||||
new process for the new socket. But that's not the point I'm making. If I run it
|
||||
with `tcp_test:listen(8000)`, and in other window do:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
while [ 1 ]; do echo "aloha"; done | nc localhost 8000
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
We'll be flooding the the server with data pretty well. Using [eprof][4] we can
|
||||
get an idea of how our code performs, and where the hang-ups are:
|
||||
|
||||
```erlang
|
||||
1> eprof:start().
|
||||
{ok,<0.34.0>}
|
||||
|
||||
2> P = spawn(tcp_test,listen,[8000]).
|
||||
<0.36.0>
|
||||
|
||||
3> eprof:start_profiling([P]).
|
||||
profiling
|
||||
|
||||
4> running_the_while_loop.
|
||||
running_the_while_loop
|
||||
|
||||
5> eprof:stop_profiling().
|
||||
profiling_stopped
|
||||
|
||||
6> eprof:analyze(procs,[{sort,time}]).
|
||||
|
||||
****** Process <0.36.0> -- 100.00 % of profiled time ***
|
||||
FUNCTION CALLS % TIME [uS / CALLS]
|
||||
-------- ----- --- ---- [----------]
|
||||
prim_inet:type_value_2/2 6 0.00 0 [ 0.00]
|
||||
|
||||
....snip....
|
||||
|
||||
prim_inet:enc_opts/2 6 0.00 8 [ 1.33]
|
||||
prim_inet:setopts/2 12303599 1.85 1466319 [ 0.12]
|
||||
tcp_test:read_loop/1 12303598 2.22 1761775 [ 0.14]
|
||||
prim_inet:encode_opt_val/1 12303599 3.50 2769285 [ 0.23]
|
||||
prim_inet:ctl_cmd/3 12303600 4.29 3399333 [ 0.28]
|
||||
prim_inet:enc_opt_val/2 24607203 5.28 4184818 [ 0.17]
|
||||
inet:setopts/2 12303598 5.72 4533863 [ 0.37]
|
||||
erlang:port_control/3 12303600 77.13 61085040 [ 4.96]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
eprof shows us where our process is spending the majority of its time. The `%`
|
||||
column indicates percentage of time the process spent during profiling inside
|
||||
any function. We can pretty clearly see that the vast majority of time was spent
|
||||
inside `erlang:port_control/3`, the BIF that `inet:setopts/2` uses to switch the
|
||||
socket to `{active,once}` mode. Amongst the calls which were called on every
|
||||
loop, it takes up by far the most amount of time. In addition all of those other
|
||||
calls are also related to `inet:setopts/2`.
|
||||
|
||||
I'm gonna rewrite our little listen server to use `{active,true}`, and we'll do
|
||||
it all again:
|
||||
|
||||
```erlang
|
||||
-module(tcp_test).
|
||||
-compile(export_all).
|
||||
|
||||
-define(TCP_OPTS, [
|
||||
binary,
|
||||
{packet, raw},
|
||||
{nodelay,true},
|
||||
{active, false},
|
||||
{reuseaddr, true},
|
||||
{keepalive,true},
|
||||
{backlog,500}
|
||||
]).
|
||||
|
||||
%Start listening
|
||||
listen(Port) ->
|
||||
{ok, L} = gen_tcp:listen(Port, ?TCP_OPTS),
|
||||
?MODULE:accept(L).
|
||||
|
||||
%Accept a connection
|
||||
accept(L) ->
|
||||
{ok, Socket} = gen_tcp:accept(L),
|
||||
inet:setopts(Socket, [{active, true}]), %Well this is new
|
||||
?MODULE:read_loop(Socket),
|
||||
io:fwrite("Done reading, connection was closed\n"),
|
||||
?MODULE:accept(L).
|
||||
|
||||
%Read everything it sends us
|
||||
read_loop(Socket) ->
|
||||
%inet:setopts(Socket, [{active, once}]),
|
||||
receive
|
||||
{tcp, _, _} ->
|
||||
do_stuff_here,
|
||||
?MODULE:read_loop(Socket);
|
||||
{tcp_closed, _}-> donezo;
|
||||
{tcp_error, _, _} -> donezo
|
||||
end.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
And the profiling results:
|
||||
|
||||
```erlang
|
||||
1> eprof:start().
|
||||
{ok,<0.34.0>}
|
||||
|
||||
2> P = spawn(tcp_test,listen,[8000]).
|
||||
<0.36.0>
|
||||
|
||||
3> eprof:start_profiling([P]).
|
||||
profiling
|
||||
|
||||
4> running_the_while_loop.
|
||||
running_the_while_loop
|
||||
|
||||
5> eprof:stop_profiling().
|
||||
profiling_stopped
|
||||
|
||||
6> eprof:analyze(procs,[{sort,time}]).
|
||||
|
||||
****** Process <0.36.0> -- 100.00 % of profiled time ***
|
||||
FUNCTION CALLS % TIME [uS / CALLS]
|
||||
-------- ----- --- ---- [----------]
|
||||
prim_inet:enc_value_1/3 7 0.00 1 [ 0.14]
|
||||
prim_inet:decode_opt_val/1 1 0.00 1 [ 1.00]
|
||||
inet:setopts/2 1 0.00 2 [ 2.00]
|
||||
prim_inet:setopts/2 2 0.00 2 [ 1.00]
|
||||
prim_inet:enum_name/2 1 0.00 2 [ 2.00]
|
||||
erlang:port_set_data/2 1 0.00 2 [ 2.00]
|
||||
inet_db:register_socket/2 1 0.00 3 [ 3.00]
|
||||
prim_inet:type_value_1/3 7 0.00 3 [ 0.43]
|
||||
|
||||
.... snip ....
|
||||
|
||||
prim_inet:type_opt_1/1 19 0.00 7 [ 0.37]
|
||||
prim_inet:enc_value/3 7 0.00 7 [ 1.00]
|
||||
prim_inet:enum_val/2 6 0.00 7 [ 1.17]
|
||||
prim_inet:dec_opt_val/1 7 0.00 7 [ 1.00]
|
||||
prim_inet:dec_value/2 6 0.00 10 [ 1.67]
|
||||
prim_inet:enc_opt/1 13 0.00 12 [ 0.92]
|
||||
prim_inet:type_opt/2 19 0.00 33 [ 1.74]
|
||||
erlang:port_control/3 3 0.00 59 [ 19.67]
|
||||
tcp_test:read_loop/1 20716370 100.00 12187488 [ 0.59]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This time our process spent almost no time at all (according to eprof, 0%)
|
||||
fiddling with the socket opts. Instead it spent all of its time in the
|
||||
read_loop doing the work we actually want to be doing.
|
||||
|
||||
# So what does this mean?
|
||||
|
||||
I'm by no means advocating never using `{active,once}`. The security concern is
|
||||
still a completely valid concern and one that `{active,once}` mitigates quite
|
||||
well. I'm simply pointing out that this mitigation has some fairly serious
|
||||
performance implications which have the potential to bite you if you're not
|
||||
careful, especially in cases where a socket is going to be receiving a large
|
||||
amount of traffic.
|
||||
|
||||
# Meta
|
||||
|
||||
These tests were done using R15B03, but I've done similar ones in R14 and found
|
||||
similar results. I have not tested R16.
|
||||
|
||||
* \[0] http://learnyousomeerlang.com/buckets-of-sockets
|
||||
* \[1] http://www.erlang.org/doc/man/gen_tcp.html#examples
|
||||
* \[2] http://erlycoder.com/25/erlang-tcp-server-tcp-client-sockets-with-gen_tcp
|
||||
|
||||
[0]: http://learnyousomeerlang.com/content
|
||||
[1]: http://www.metabrew.com/article/a-million-user-comet-application-with-mochiweb-part-1
|
||||
[2]: http://www.erlang.org/doc/man/inet.html#setopts-2
|
||||
[3]: http://www.erlang.org/doc/man/gen_tcp.html#recv-2
|
||||
[4]: http://www.erlang.org/doc/man/eprof.html
|
95
generations.md
Normal file
95
generations.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
|
||||
# Generations
|
||||
|
||||
A simple file distribution strategy for very large scale, high-availability
|
||||
file-services.
|
||||
|
||||
# The problem
|
||||
|
||||
Working at a shop where we have millions of different files, any of which could
|
||||
be arbitrarily chosen to serve to a file at any given time. These files are
|
||||
uploaded by users of the app and retrieved by others.
|
||||
|
||||
Scaling such a system is no easy task. The chosen solution involves shuffling
|
||||
files around on a nearly constant basis, making sure that files which are more
|
||||
"popular" are on fast drives, while at the same time making sure that no drives
|
||||
are at capicty and at the same time that all files, even newly uploaded ones,
|
||||
are stored redundantly.
|
||||
|
||||
The problem with this solution is one of coordination. At any given moment the
|
||||
app needs to be able to "find" a file so it can give the client a link to
|
||||
download the file from one of the servers that it's on. Full-filling this simple
|
||||
requirement means that all datastores/caches where information about where a
|
||||
file lives need to be up-to-date at all times, and even then there are
|
||||
race-conditions and network failures to contend with, while at all times the
|
||||
requirements of the app evolve and change.
|
||||
|
||||
# A simpler solution
|
||||
|
||||
Let's say you want all files which get uploaded to be replicated in triplicate
|
||||
in some capacity. You buy three identical hard-disks, and put each on a separate
|
||||
server. As files get uploaded by clients, each file gets put on each drive
|
||||
immediately. When the drives are filled (which should be at around the same
|
||||
time), you stop uploading to them.
|
||||
|
||||
That was generation 0.
|
||||
|
||||
You buy three more drives, and start putting all files on them instead. This is
|
||||
going to be generation 1. Repeat until you run out of money.
|
||||
|
||||
That's it.
|
||||
|
||||
## That's it?
|
||||
|
||||
It seems simple and obvious, and maybe it's the standard thing which is done,
|
||||
but as far as I can tell no-one has written about it (though I'm probably not
|
||||
searching for the right thing, let me know if this is the case!).
|
||||
|
||||
## Advantages
|
||||
|
||||
* It's so simple to implement, you could probably do it in a day if you're
|
||||
starting a project from scratch
|
||||
|
||||
* By definition of the scheme all files are replicated in multiple places.
|
||||
|
||||
* Minimal information about where a file "is" needs to be stored. When a file is
|
||||
uploaded all that's needed is to know what generation it is in, and then what
|
||||
nodes/drives are in that generation.
|
||||
|
||||
* Drives don't need to "know" about each other. What I mean by this is that
|
||||
whatever is running as the receive point for file-uploads on each drive doesn't
|
||||
have to coordinate with its siblings running on the other drives in the
|
||||
generation. In fact it doesn't need to coordinate with anyone. You could
|
||||
literally rsync files onto your drives if you wanted to. I would recommend using
|
||||
[marlin][0] though :)
|
||||
|
||||
* Scaling is easy. When you run out of space you can simply start a new
|
||||
generation. If you don't like playing that close to the chest there's nothing to
|
||||
say you can't have two generations active at the same time.
|
||||
|
||||
* Upgrading is easy. As long as a generation is not marked-for-upload, you can
|
||||
easily copy all files in the generation into a new set of bigger, badder drives,
|
||||
add those drives into the generation in your code, remove the old ones, then
|
||||
mark the generation as uploadable again.
|
||||
|
||||
* Distribution is easy. You just copy a generation's files onto a new drive in
|
||||
Europe or wherever you're getting an uptick in traffic from and you're good to
|
||||
go.
|
||||
|
||||
* Management is easy. It's trivial to find out how many times a file has been
|
||||
replicated, or how many countries it's in, or what hardware it's being served
|
||||
from (given you have easy access to information about specific drives).
|
||||
|
||||
## Caveats
|
||||
|
||||
The big caveat here is that this is just an idea. It has NOT been tested in
|
||||
production. But we have enough faith in it that we're going to give it a shot at
|
||||
cryptic.io. I'll keep this page updated.
|
||||
|
||||
The second caveat is that this scheme does not inherently support caching. If a
|
||||
file suddenly becomes super popular the world over your hard-disks might not be
|
||||
able to keep up, and it's probably not feasible to have an FIO drive in *every*
|
||||
generation. I think that [groupcache][1] may be the answer to this problem,
|
||||
assuming your files are reasonably small, but again I haven't tested it yet.
|
||||
|
||||
[0]: https://github.com/cryptic-io/marlin
|
||||
[1]: https://github.com/golang/groupcache
|
73
goplus.md
Normal file
73
goplus.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
|
||||
# Go and project root
|
||||
|
||||
Compared to other languages go has some strange behavior regarding its project
|
||||
root settings. If you import a library called `somelib`, go will look for a
|
||||
`src/somelib` folder in all of the folders in the `$GOPATH` environment
|
||||
variable. This works nicely for globally installed packages, but it makes
|
||||
encapsulating a project with a specific version, or modified version, rather
|
||||
tedious. Whenever you go to work on this project you'll have to add its path to
|
||||
your `$GOPATH`, or add the path permanently, which could break other projects
|
||||
which may use a different version of `somelib`.
|
||||
|
||||
My solution is in the form of a simple script I'm calling go+. go+ will search
|
||||
in currrent directory and all of its parents for a file called `GOPROJROOT`. If
|
||||
it finds that file in a directory, it prepends that directory's absolute path to
|
||||
your `$GOPATH` and stops the search. Regardless of whether or not `GOPROJROOT`
|
||||
was found go+ will passthrough all arguments to the actual go call. The
|
||||
modification to `$GOPATH` will only last the duration of the call.
|
||||
|
||||
As an example, consider the following:
|
||||
```
|
||||
/tmp
|
||||
/hello
|
||||
GOPROJROOT
|
||||
/src
|
||||
/somelib/somelib.go
|
||||
/hello.go
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If `hello.go` depends on `somelib`, as long as you run go+ from `/tmp/hello` or
|
||||
one of its children your project will still compile
|
||||
|
||||
Here is the source code for go+:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
|
||||
SEARCHING_FOR=GOPROJROOT
|
||||
ORIG_DIR=$(pwd)
|
||||
|
||||
STOPSEARCH=0
|
||||
SEARCH_DIR=$ORIG_DIR
|
||||
while [ $STOPSEARCH = 0 ]; do
|
||||
|
||||
RES=$( find $SEARCH_DIR -maxdepth 1 -type f -name $SEARCHING_FOR | \
|
||||
grep -P "$SEARCHING_FOR$" | \
|
||||
head -n1 )
|
||||
|
||||
if [ "$RES" = "" ]; then
|
||||
if [ "$SEARCH_DIR" = "/" ]; then
|
||||
STOPSEARCH=1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
cd ..
|
||||
SEARCH_DIR=$(pwd)
|
||||
else
|
||||
export GOPATH=$SEARCH_DIR:$GOPATH
|
||||
STOPSEARCH=1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
done
|
||||
|
||||
cd "$ORIG_DIR"
|
||||
exec go $@
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
# UPDATE: Goat
|
||||
|
||||
I'm leaving this post for posterity, but go+ has some serious flaws in it. For
|
||||
one, it doesn't allow for specifying the version of a dependency you want to
|
||||
use. To this end, I wrote [goat][0] which does all the things go+ does, plus
|
||||
real dependency management, PLUS it is built in a way that if you've been
|
||||
following go's best-practices for code organization you shouldn't have to change
|
||||
any of your existing code AT ALL. It's cool, check it out.
|
||||
|
||||
[0]: http://github.com/mediocregopher/goat
|
BIN
lagom-master.zip
BIN
lagom-master.zip
Binary file not shown.
2
lagom-master/.gitignore
vendored
2
lagom-master/.gitignore
vendored
@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
|
||||
_site/
|
||||
.DS_Store
|
27
res/go+
Executable file
27
res/go+
Executable file
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
|
||||
SEARCHING_FOR=GOPROJROOT
|
||||
ORIG_DIR=$(pwd)
|
||||
|
||||
STOPSEARCH=0
|
||||
SEARCH_DIR=$ORIG_DIR
|
||||
while [ $STOPSEARCH = 0 ]; do
|
||||
|
||||
RES=$( find $SEARCH_DIR -maxdepth 1 -type f -name $SEARCHING_FOR | \
|
||||
grep -P "$SEARCHING_FOR$" | \
|
||||
head -n1 )
|
||||
|
||||
if [ "$RES" = "" ]; then
|
||||
if [ "$SEARCH_DIR" = "/" ]; then
|
||||
STOPSEARCH=1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
cd ..
|
||||
SEARCH_DIR=$(pwd)
|
||||
else
|
||||
export GOPATH=$SEARCH_DIR:$GOPATH
|
||||
STOPSEARCH=1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
done
|
||||
|
||||
cd "$ORIG_DIR"
|
||||
exec go $@
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user