|
|
|
@ -205,12 +205,14 @@ The open source movement has shown that participation, not profitability, is the |
|
|
|
|
primary driver of successful software. Why should it not be the case for our |
|
|
|
|
service infrastructure? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Footnotes |
|
|
|
|
----- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Footnotes** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* I use a lot of words here whose definitions are by no means agreed upon. I've |
|
|
|
|
done my best to stick to my best understanding of word meanings, and to be |
|
|
|
|
consistent in them. If you disagree with my usage of a word, I'm sorry. It |
|
|
|
|
doesn't mean either of us wrong, we just speak different. |
|
|
|
|
doesn't mean either of us is wrong, we just speak different. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* There is an existing project, under the OpenStack project, called Open |
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure. It has to do with some kind of standardization around the |