old code new ideas
This commit is contained in:
parent
267e0f21d8
commit
e6501d254f
223
src/_posts/2021-02-06-old-code-new-ideas.md
Normal file
223
src/_posts/2021-02-06-old-code-new-ideas.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: >-
|
||||
Old Code, New Ideas
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
Looking back at my old code with bemusement and horror.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
About 3 years ago I put a lot of effort into a set of golang packages called
|
||||
[mediocre-go-lib][mediocre-go-lib]. The idea was to create a framework around
|
||||
the ideas I had laid out in [this blog post][program-structure] around the
|
||||
structure and composability of programs. What I found in using the framework was
|
||||
that it was quite bulky, not fully thought out, and ultimately difficult for
|
||||
anyone but me to use. So.... a typical framework then.
|
||||
|
||||
My ideas about program structure haven't changed a ton since then, but my ideas
|
||||
around the patterns which enable that structure have simplified dramatically
|
||||
(see [my more recent post][component-oriented] for more on that). So in that
|
||||
spirit I've decided to cut a `v2` branch of `mediocre-go-lib` and start trimming
|
||||
the fat.
|
||||
|
||||
This is going to be an exercise both in deleting old code (very fun) and
|
||||
re-examining old code which I used to think was good but now know is bad (even
|
||||
more fun), and I've been looking forward to it for some time.
|
||||
|
||||
[mediocre-go-lib]: https://github.com/mediocregopher/mediocre-go-lib
|
||||
[program-structure]: {% post_url 2019-08-02-program-structure-and-composability %}
|
||||
[component-oriented]: {% post_url 2020-11-16-component-oriented-programming %}
|
||||
|
||||
## mcmp, mctx
|
||||
|
||||
The two foundational pieces of `mediocre-go-lib` are the `mcmp` and `mctx`
|
||||
packages. `mcmp` primarily deals with its [mcmp.Component][component] type,
|
||||
which is a key/value store which can be used by other packages to store and
|
||||
retrieve component-level information. Each `mcmp.Component` exists as a node in
|
||||
a tree of `mcmp.Component`s, and these form the structure of a program.
|
||||
`mcmp.Component` is able to provide information about its place in that tree as
|
||||
well (i.e. its path, parents, children, etc...).
|
||||
|
||||
If this sounds cumbersome and of questionable utility that's because it is. It's
|
||||
also not even correct, because a component in a program exists in a DAG, not a
|
||||
tree. Moreover, each component can keep track of whatever data it needs for
|
||||
itself using typed fields on a struct. Pretty much all other packages in
|
||||
`mediocre-go-lib` depend on `mcmp` to function, but they don't _need_ to, I just
|
||||
designed it that way.
|
||||
|
||||
So my plan of attack is going to be to delete `mcmp` completely, and repair all
|
||||
the other packages.
|
||||
|
||||
The other foundational piece of `mediocre-go-lib` is [mctx][mctx]. Where `mcmp`
|
||||
dealt with arbitrary key/value storage on the component level, `mctx` deals with
|
||||
it on the contextual level, where each go-routine (i.e. thread) corresponds to a
|
||||
`context.Context`. The primary function of `mctx` is this one:
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
// Annotate takes in one or more key/value pairs (kvs' length must be even) and
|
||||
// returns a Context carrying them.
|
||||
func Annotate(ctx context.Context, kvs ...interface{}) context.Context
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
I'm inclined to keep this around for now because it will be useful for logging,
|
||||
but there's one change I'd like to make to it. In its current form the value of
|
||||
every key/value pair must already exist before being used to annotate the
|
||||
`context.Context`, but this can be cumbersome in cases where the data you'd want
|
||||
to annotate is quite hefty to generate but also not necessarily going to be
|
||||
used. I'd like to have the option to make annotating occur lazily. For this I
|
||||
add an `Annotator` interface and a `WithAnnotator` function which takes it as an
|
||||
argument, as well as some internal refactoring to make it all work right:
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
// Annotations is a set of key/value pairs representing a set of annotations. It
|
||||
// implements the Annotator interface along with other useful post-processing
|
||||
// methods.
|
||||
type Annotations map[interface{}]interface{}
|
||||
|
||||
// Annotator is a type which can add annotation data to an existing set of
|
||||
// annotations. The Annotate method should be expected to be called in a
|
||||
// non-thread-safe manner.
|
||||
type Annotator interface {
|
||||
Annotate(Annotations)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// WithAnnotator takes in an Annotator and returns a Context which will produce
|
||||
// that Annotator's annotations when the Annotations function is called. The
|
||||
// Annotator will be not be evaluated until the first call to Annotations.
|
||||
func WithAnnotator(ctx context.Context, annotator Annotator) context.Context
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`Annotator` is designed like it is for two reasons. The more obvious design,
|
||||
where the method has no arguments and returns a map, would cause a memory
|
||||
allocation on every invocation, which could be a drag for long chains of
|
||||
contexts whose annotations are being evaluated frequently. The obvious design
|
||||
also leaves open questions about whether the returned map can be modified by
|
||||
whoever receives it. The design given here dodges these problems without any
|
||||
obvious drawbacks.
|
||||
|
||||
The original implementation also had this unnecessary `Annotation` type:
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
// Annotation describes the annotation of a key/value pair made on a Context via
|
||||
// the Annotate call.
|
||||
type Annotation struct {
|
||||
Key, Value interface{}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
I don't know why this was ever needed, as an `Annotation` was never passed into
|
||||
nor returned from any function. It was part of the type `AnnotationSet`, but
|
||||
that could easily be refactored into a `map[interface{}]interface{}` instead. So
|
||||
I factored `Annotation` out completely.
|
||||
|
||||
[component]: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/mediocregopher/mediocre-go-lib/mcmp#Component
|
||||
[mctx]: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/mediocregopher/mediocre-go-lib/mctx
|
||||
|
||||
## mcfg, mrun
|
||||
|
||||
The next package to tackle is [mcfg][mcfg], which deals with configuration via
|
||||
command line arguments and environment variables. The package is set up to use
|
||||
the old `mcmp.Component` type such that each component could declare its own
|
||||
configuration parameters in the global configuration. In this way the
|
||||
configuration would have a hierarchy of its own which matches the component
|
||||
tree.
|
||||
|
||||
Given that I now think `mcmp.Component` isn't the right course of action it
|
||||
would be the natural step to take that aspect out of `mcfg`, leaving only a
|
||||
basic command-line and environment variable parser. There are many other basic
|
||||
parsers of this sort out there, including [one][flagconfig] or [two][lever] I
|
||||
wrote myself, and frankly I don't think the world needs another. So `mcfg` is
|
||||
going away.
|
||||
|
||||
The [mrun][mrun] package is the corresponding package to `mcfg`; where `mcfg`
|
||||
dealt with configuration of components `mrun` deals with the initialization and
|
||||
shutdown of those same components. Like `mcfg`, `mrun` relies heavily on
|
||||
`mcmp.Component`, and doesn't really have any function with that type gone. So
|
||||
`mrun` is a gonner too.
|
||||
|
||||
[mcfg]: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/mediocregopher/mediocre-go-lib/mcfg
|
||||
[mrun]: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/mediocregopher/mediocre-go-lib/mrun
|
||||
[flagconfig]: https://github.com/mediocregopher/flagconfig
|
||||
[lever]: https://github.com/mediocregopher/lever
|
||||
|
||||
## mlog
|
||||
|
||||
The [mlog][mlog] package is primarily concerned with, as you might guess,
|
||||
logging. While there are many useful logging packages out there none of them
|
||||
integrate with `mctx`'s annotations, so it is useful to have a custom logging
|
||||
package here. `mlog` also has the nice property of not being extremely coupled
|
||||
to `mcmp.Component` like other packages; it's only necessary to delete a handful
|
||||
of global functions which aren't a direct part of the `mlog.Logger` type in
|
||||
order to free the package from that burden.
|
||||
|
||||
With that said, the `mlog.Logger` type could still use some work. It's primary
|
||||
pattern looks like this:
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
// Message describes a message to be logged.
|
||||
type Message struct {
|
||||
Level
|
||||
Description string
|
||||
Contexts []context.Context
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Info logs an InfoLevel message.
|
||||
func (l *Logger) Info(descr string, ctxs ...context.Context) {
|
||||
l.Log(mkMsg(InfoLevel, descr, ctxs...))
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The idea was that if the user has multiple `Contexts` in hand, each one possibly
|
||||
having some relevant annotations, all of those `Context`s' annotations could be
|
||||
merged together for the log entry.
|
||||
|
||||
Looking back it seems to me that the only thing `mlog` should care about is the
|
||||
annotations, and not _where_ those annotations came from. So the new pattern
|
||||
looks like this:
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
// Message describes a message to be logged.
|
||||
type Message struct {
|
||||
Context context.Context
|
||||
Level
|
||||
Description string
|
||||
Annotators []Annotators
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Info logs a LevelInfo message.
|
||||
func (l *Logger) Info(ctx context.Context, descr string, annotators ...mctx.Annotator)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The annotations on the given `Context` will be included, and then any further
|
||||
`Annotator`s can be added on. This will leave room for `merr` later.
|
||||
|
||||
There's some other warts in `mlog.Logger` that should be dealt with as well,
|
||||
including some extraneous methods which were only used due to `mcmp.Component`,
|
||||
some poorly named types, a message handler which didn't properly clean itself
|
||||
up, and making `NewLogger` take in parameters with which it can be customized as
|
||||
needed (previously it only allowed for a single configuration). I've also
|
||||
extended `Message` to include a timestamp, a namespace field, and some other
|
||||
useful information.
|
||||
|
||||
[mlog]: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/mediocregopher/mediocre-go-lib/mlog
|
||||
|
||||
## Future Work
|
||||
|
||||
I've run out of time for today, but future work on this package includes:
|
||||
|
||||
* Updating [merr][merr] with support for `mctx.Annotations`.
|
||||
* Auditing the [mnet][mnet], [mhttp][mhttp], and [mrpc][mrpc] packages to see if
|
||||
they contain anything worth keeping.
|
||||
* Probably deleting the [m][m] package entirely; I don't even really remember
|
||||
what it does.
|
||||
* Probably deleting the [mdb][mdb] package entirely; it only makes sense in the
|
||||
context of `mcmp.Component`.
|
||||
* Making a difficult decision about [mtest][mtest]; I put a lot of work into it,
|
||||
but is it really any better than [testify][testify]?
|
||||
|
||||
[merr]: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/mediocregopher/mediocre-go-lib/merr
|
||||
[mnet]: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/mediocregopher/mediocre-go-lib/mnet
|
||||
[mhttp]: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/mediocregopher/mediocre-go-lib/mhttp
|
||||
[mrpc]: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/mediocregopher/mediocre-go-lib/mrpc
|
||||
[m]: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/mediocregopher/mediocre-go-lib/m
|
||||
[mdb]: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/mediocregopher/mediocre-go-lib/mdb
|
||||
[mtest]: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/mediocregopher/mediocre-go-lib/mtest
|
||||
[testify]: https://github.com/stretchr/testify
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user